SAMP MType parameters issue
brino at eso.org
Thu Nov 6 05:39:30 PST 2008
Please make it a requirement.
Freedom at this level only creates headaches further down the road...
> So, my vote is in favour of changing these parameter names as Luigi
> suggests, and introducing at least a RECOMMENDation (or should it be a
> REQUIREment?) in the standard that future MTypes use parameter and
> (for symmetry) return value names following the suggested BNF.
More information about the apps-samp