SAMP MType parameters issue
luigi at lambrate.inaf.it
Mon Nov 10 03:13:01 PST 2008
Even if I do not see the necessity of this more restrictive BNF,
personally I have no objections.
Juan de Dios Santander Vela ha scritto:
> There are other languages (C) for which identifiers can only be of the
> form you are expressing, and many languages with C runtimes share the
> same restrictions.
> However, I would go for identifier as:
> identifier ::= (letter) (letter | digit | "_")*
> ¿Do you think this is too restrictive? I don't see the point of named
> parameters which use _variableName, as this is typically done for hidden
> properties... And I think we should allow MType identifiers to be legal
> identifiers in all (most) languages... even if a protocol identifier
> does not need to correspond one to one to variables in a computer language.
INAF - IASF Milano
Via Bassini 15, I-20133 Milano, Italy
Phone (+39) 02 23 699 470
Fax (+39) 02 26 660 17
More information about the apps-samp