[obs-tap] draft summary topic 2 : Representing Utypes in Obstap implementation
francois.bonnarel at astro.unistra.fr
Wed Mar 23 15:43:38 PDT 2011
Le 18/03/2011 18:54, Mireille Louys a écrit :
> Topic 2 : Representing Utypes in Obstap implementation
> This topic is much more general than the Obstap effort.
> I think more discussion and study of the life cycle of a Utype string
> in applications , protocols and circulating documents is needed to
> decide which strategy to adopt for Utype Case: ( lower, Camel , etc.) .
> Data base are allowed to store strings as they need, but lisibility is
> important for users/developers.
> I hope this topic can be discussed in DM or more general session in
Sure we have to make some progress on utypes syntax, storage and usage
in napoli, if interoperability via
Data models is to be taken serious.
> Please tell your opinion on the list
More information about the dal