dm - by author
- Alasdair Allan
- Alberto Conti
- Alberto Micol
- amicol-at-eso.org
- Andreas Wicenec
- Anita M. S. Richards
- Anita Richards
- Arnold Rots
- Ashish Mahabal
- bonnarel-at-alinda.u-strasbg.fr
- Brad Cavanagh
- Brian Thomas
- Re: Coordinate System in DM (2006-09-26Z14:50:10)
- Re: Catalogue and Source Data Models (2006-08-03Z14:50:56)
- Links to W3C workflow/processing models (2006-05-19Z17:42:15)
- ORML layer for doing XQuery on relational databases (2006-05-18Z22:39:13)
- catalogue DM draft/get-to-gether (2006-05-17Z00:13:00)
- [Quantity]: Reinventing the wheel?? (Was: Re: Handling data cubes in VO (2005-12-27Z03:06:03)
- Support of general parser lib (Was: Re: Expressing 2- and 3-D coordinates (2005-12-15Z18:23:50)
- Re: Expressing 2- and 3-D coordinates (2005-12-15Z16:09:52)
- [Quantity] Re: Expressing 2- and 3-D coordinates (2005-12-14Z15:16:00)
- [Catalog/Quantity]:Updated materials on our version of VO:Catalog (2005-09-30Z13:09:01)
- Q in STC (and other DM model components), Why not? (Was: Re: Charac Answer) (2005-09-16Z14:47:27)
- Re: [Ontology] UCDs vs ontologies? (2005-06-02Z15:08:46)
- Merger of Char, STC and Quantity (Was: Re: Using Quantity in Char model (Was: Re: Characterization data model (2005-05-24Z19:17:57)
- Re: Using Quantity in Char model (Was: Re: Characterization data model (2005-05-24Z18:59:50)
- Using Quantity in Char model (Was: Re: Characterization data model (2005-05-18Z16:43:26)
- Re: Characterization data model (2005-05-16Z13:48:30)
- Re: 3D data model: plan (2005-02-17Z20:32:17)
- [UNITS] Re: Dimensionless units (2005-02-17Z15:29:10)
- Re: [Units] : (Was: Re: SED Data Model: Questions and Comments (2005-02-16Z18:49:24)
- [Units] : (Was: Re: SED Data Model: Questions and Comments (2005-02-16Z18:25:47)
- [UNITS] : (Was: Re: SED Data Model: Questions and Comments) (2005-02-16Z17:01:35)
- Re: SED Data Model: Questions and Comments (2005-02-15Z18:07:46)
- Re: Converging the Data Models (2004-09-16Z14:46:35)
- Re: [QUANTITY] : STC merge (Was: Re: Data Models in Pune) (2004-09-16Z14:40:11)
- [QUANTITY] : STC merge (Was: Re: Data Models in Pune) (2004-09-17Z14:13:25)
- [QUANTITY] : Java Quantity Data Model package available (2004-08-05Z22:08:56)
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency (2004-05-19Z16:11:32)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Choosing default accuracy/units values (2004-05-18Z14:16:42)
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? (2004-05-18Z14:10:15)
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? (2004-05-17Z21:16:01)
- Re: Boston agenda (2004-05-17Z19:01:08)
- [QUANTITY] Choosing default accuracy/units values (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency (2004-05-17Z17:05:45)
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency (2004-05-14Z19:36:07)
- Re: Modelling small things (2004-05-14Z17:46:36)
- Re: Q as inheritor or aggregator? Re: Quantity - where does it fit? (2004-05-14Z15:13:21)
- Q as inheritor or aggregator? Re: Quantity - where does it fit? (2004-05-14Z14:47:53)
- Definition of Frames. (2004-05-13Z17:04:23)
- No requirements?!? (Was: Re: Serialising vs modelling (2004-05-13Z16:45:12)
- Re: Inheritance of different Q's (2004-05-13Z15:16:52)
- Re: Vector-valued Quantities (2004-05-13Z14:58:12)
- [QUANTITY] : Examples available (Was: Re: Not a plethora (Was: Re: A plehtora of Quantities (2004-05-12Z17:22:59)
- [QUANTITY] XMLSpy graphs out of date (Was: Re: BQ with Meta-data.. (Was: Re: Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-12Z16:41:28)
- [QUANTITY] How to store coords, why iteration order is ok in locator (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-12Z16:38:37)
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) (2004-05-12Z16:09:09)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-12Z15:49:57)
- BQ with Meta-data.. (Was: Re: Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-12Z15:23:44)
- Not a plethora (Was: Re: A plehtora of Quantities (2004-05-12Z15:19:29)
- Decomposition and the Searchability of Q and Accuracy is important (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-12Z04:50:28)
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) (2004-05-11Z21:06:55)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-11Z21:02:29)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-11Z18:21:10)
- Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) (2004-05-11Z18:09:51)
- Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-11Z17:59:30)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-11Z17:44:38)
- Philosophy of design for Q : yes, a common structure is appropriate and possible. (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-11Z16:06:07)
- No set methods in the API ? (Was: Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping (2004-05-11Z15:40:41)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-11Z15:29:33)
- Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-11Z15:23:56)
- Collection of use-case code? (Was: Re: a Quantity to rule them all? Not quite. (2004-05-11Z15:09:43)
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping (2004-05-11Z01:54:18)
- Re: Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation (2004-05-10Z21:59:11)
- Re: Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation (2004-05-10Z20:56:42)
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC (2004-05-10Z20:50:32)
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC (2004-05-10Z19:18:57)
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC (2004-05-10Z18:31:31)
- Relationship between Q and STC (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-10Z17:41:43)
- Re: Heaviness of Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation (2004-05-10Z17:37:18)
- Re: Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-10Z17:25:36)
- The relationship of Q and STC? A proposal. (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-10Z17:15:17)
- Re: Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-10Z17:07:17)
- Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-10Z16:39:07)
- Heaviness of Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation (2004-05-10Z15:50:52)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 (2004-05-10Z15:27:45)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - analogue absurdium (2004-05-10Z13:18:20)
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts (2004-05-03Z16:15:58)
- Tom is right: and here is why this approach is wrong. (Was: Re: UTYPEs for SIAP) (2004-04-01Z15:55:49)
- XMLSpy Plots needed (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] XML serialization (was: new drafts) (2004-03-10Z16:15:58)
- Please ignore.. bad mailer. Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Comparison of characteristics in C-D to T-S model (2003-12-16Z03:55:08)
- [QUANTITY] Comparison of characteristics in C-D to T-S model (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors) (2003-11-18Z02:44:12)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (2003-11-18Z17:01:05)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (2003-11-18Z16:40:12)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (2003-11-18Z16:29:35)
- [QUANTITY] The difference between quantities and measurements (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (Was: Re: [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme) (2003-11-18Z15:03:49)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (Was: Re: [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme) (2003-11-17Z20:29:54)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (Was: Re: [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme) (2003-11-17Z20:00:12)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (2003-11-17Z19:48:45)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities sometimes have errors (2003-11-17Z19:44:10)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities sometimes have errors (2003-11-17Z19:08:29)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Use-cases, role in larger scheme (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Quantity "arguments") (2003-11-17Z19:06:01)
- [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (Was: Re: [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme) (2003-11-17Z17:01:11)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities sometimes have errors (2003-11-17Z18:55:22)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (Was: Re: [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme) (2003-11-17Z17:52:38)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Why quantities always have errors (Was: Re: [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme) (2003-11-17Z17:30:22)
- [QUANTITY] : class design complexity philosophy (Was: Re: [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme) (2003-11-17Z16:17:02)
- [QUANTIT] Use-cases, role in larger scheme (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Quantity "arguments") (2003-11-14Z20:43:57)
- [QUANTITY] My Summary of the "arguments"/transform discussion/thread (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Quantity "arguments") (2003-11-14Z18:55:55)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Quantity "arguments" (was [TRANSFORM] What is a "frame"?) (2003-11-07Z17:00:53)
- [TRANSFORM] What is a "frame"? (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Justification for Matrix Quantities) (2003-11-04Z17:34:15)
- [TRANSFORM] using algorithm to create axis (quantity) values and frame transforms (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Justification for Matrix Quantities) (2003-11-04Z17:21:43)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Justification for Matrix Quantities (2003-11-04Z15:00:48)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Justification for Matrix Quantities (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Requirements and apology) (2003-11-04Z11:58:41)
- Re: [QUANTITY] why we should have string values in quantity (2003-11-03Z20:23:49)
- Re: [Quantity] : Use case document on Twiki (2003-11-03Z19:26:16)
- [Quantity] : Use case document on Twiki (2003-11-03Z18:04:20)
- Re: [QUANTITY] why we should have string values in quantity (2003-11-03Z17:16:48)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Justification for Matrix Quantities (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Requirements and apology) (2003-10-31Z14:23:03)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data types question (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] The discussion so far (2003-10-31Z15:36:48)
- [QUANTITY] Data types question (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] The discussion so far (2003-10-31Z15:01:57)
- [DM] Please label discussions appropriately. (Was Re: [QUANTITY] Plea for pragmatism) (2003-10-31Z14:43:10)
- [QUANTITY] Suggested method of work to maintain progress. (was: Re: [QUANTITY] The discussion so far) (2003-10-31Z14:40:40)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Justification for Matrix Quantities (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Requirements and apology) (2003-10-30Z20:11:17)
- [QUANTITY] Justification for Matrix Quantities (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Requirements and apology) (2003-10-30Z19:34:26)
- [QUANTITY] our view of holding qualities in quantities. (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Requirements and apology (2003-10-30Z15:39:41)
- [QUANTITY] Needs Coverage and Quality meta-data? (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Plea for pragmatism) (2003-10-29Z14:07:57)
- [DM] Plea for constructive progress (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Plea for pragmatism) (2003-10-29Z13:43:10)
- Re: [QUANTITY]: gather requirements for quantity model (2003-10-28Z23:03:33)
- Re: [QUANTITY]: gather requirements for quantity model (2003-10-28Z21:29:44)
- [QUANTITY]: Web site to gather requirements for quantity model (2003-10-28Z18:16:44)
- [QUANTITY] A project thats definitely worth a look for ideas.. (Was: Re: From a previous project...) (2003-10-28Z13:26:56)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Do we need it? Some quantities (2003-10-28Z00:25:23)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Do we need it? Some quantities (2003-10-28Z00:46:54)
- [QUANTITY] Attempt at gathering consensus view of quantities through requirements capture (2003-10-27Z21:32:58)
- Uploaded white paper to Twiki (2003-10-23Z18:50:33)
- [QUANTITY] Re: Answers to questions/issues you raise & white paper (Was: Re: [QUANTITY]Re: Quantity.owl) (2003-10-10Z16:38:24)
- Correction:2nd link to paper is wrong. (2003-10-10Z12:45:58)
- Answers to questions/issues you raise & white paper (Was: Re: [QUANTITY]Re: Quantity.owl) (2003-10-10Z12:40:08)
- Re: UCD and DM (2003-10-09Z19:40:06)
- Re: [QUANTITY]Re: Quantity.owl (2003-10-09Z14:55:35)
- Re: [QUANTITY]Re: Quantity.owl (2003-10-09Z14:05:24)
- Why OWL Unit Ontology has no Log/Exp (Was: Re: OWL ontology for unit) (2003-09-02Z14:16:17)
- [QUANTITY] Choice of DM representation (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] An object- and domain-oriented proposal in UML and XML) (2003-05-28Z14:33:29)
- Re: Fwd: [QUANTITY] An object- and domain-oriented proposal in UML and XML (2003-05-27Z18:31:11)
- [QUANTITY] An object- and domain-oriented proposal in UML and XML (2003-05-27Z17:33:02)
- Re: [QUANTITY] Pulling it all together - missing some things (2003-05-23Z15:05:28)
- Re: Basic units in XML (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Units) (2003-05-21Z20:01:50)
- Basic units in XML (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Units) (2003-05-21Z19:26:23)
- Bruno Rino
- Carlos Rodrigo Blanco
- Carol Christian
- chil-at-sai.msu.su
- Clive Page
- David Barnes
- David Berry
- dbarnes-at-isis.ph.unimelb.edu.au
- derriere-at-newb6.u-strasbg.fr
- DIDELON Pierre
- Dobos, Laszlo
- Doug Tody
- Douglas Tody
- Dubernet-Tuckey marie lise
- Ed Shaya
- Elizabeth Auden
- Enrique Solano Marquez
- Fabien Chereau
- Francois Bonnarel
- Francois Ochsenbein
- François Bonnarel
- Gerard
- Gerard Lemson
- Giaretta, DL (David)
- Gilles DUVERT
- glemson
- Guy Rixon
- Igor Chilingarian
- Igor V. Chilingarian
- Inga Kamp
- Ivo Busko
- IVOA Document Coordinator
- jcm-at-head-cfa.cfa.harvard.edu
- Jesus J. Salgado
- Jesus Salgado
- John Good
- Jonathan Fay
- Jonathan McDowell