who is actively developing with VOResource?
rplante at poplar.ncsa.uiuc.edu
Tue Nov 18 11:12:54 PST 2003
I'd like to hear who is involved in using the VOResource metadata and how
things are going. I've been in intense communication with people here in
the NVO project, but I haven't heard too much from abroad. Could some
non-NVO people post a few words?
As my previous message indicated, issues are coming up that we will need
to deal with, and it would be good to hear about who is dealing with them
There are various issues that have come up in the NVO experience so far:
* The Coverage mark-up is a temporary stand-in, and it hasn't been well
reviewed and exercised. Is it sufficient?
o there was a suggestion that we alter it to allow
multiple, alternative spatial coverage descriptions where one in
the ICRS frame would be required.
* There remains a problem in VODataService-v0.4 with the use of a fixed
* There was a suggestion that there could be an easier/better way to
identify specific kinds of services (e.g. SIA) than with
the StandardID element.
More information about the registry