Hi All,
Following Doug's email, I thought I would try the vocabularies developed in the explicator project through the validation service. ( I have been trying to do this for months but the validation service has been down.) The results are very positive:
*Vocabulary * *Source File * *Result page * A&A Keywords http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Vocabularies/AAkeys-v1.0.rdf http://tinyurl.com/29vs5q AOIM Vocabulary http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Vocabularies/AOIM-v1.0.rdf http://tinyurl.com/yvyscs UCD http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Vocabularies/UCD1-v1.0.rdf http://tinyurl.com/23gg3t
All three vocabularies passed all of the tests except for the A&A Keywords and AOIM vocabulary failing
Test D.2. (Possible Missing Top Concept Assertion for Scheme)
However, the failure of this test is down to the validation service not correctly handling collections. It does not have the rule for making members of a collection inherit the relationships of the collection. I have run versions of the vocabulary with the additionally inferred relationships through and
Alasdair
Douglas Burke wrote:
>
> Rick,
>
> I've just tried out the experimental SKOS validator [1] on your IVOA
> thesaurus and it spits out some problems [2].
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/validation
> [2] http://tinyurl.com/33lnor
> (this is only with the base level)
>
> I remember you mentioning the Ae/Be/Herbig AeBe circularity before,
> but the other issues are new to me (most are of the form "term has
> same NT and RT", but there are a couple where the prefLabel field
> matches one of the altLabel fields)
>
> Doug
>
Received on 2007-11-28Z10:40:20