IVOAT Top Level Concepts
seaman at noao.edu
Fri Nov 2 06:48:00 PDT 2007
On Nov 2, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Alasdair Gray wrote:
> So, the purpose of this email was to highlight that we are
> deviating from the original IAU Thesaurus poly-hierarchy and to
> argue that this is a good thing and that we should keep going this
> way. Does anyone object?
No objection here, but has anyone thought to contact the authors of
the IAU Thesaurus for comments - or even better yet, to gauge their
interest in joining the effort? The point of the IVOA, after all, is
to be of service to the astronomical community. The IAU is a key way
to reach same.
More information about the semantics