skos:notation and AVM
seaman at noao.edu
Wed Jul 2 11:07:46 PDT 2008
On Jul 1, 2008, at 3:27 AM, Alasdair Gray wrote:
> In going through the document, I have found that there is now a
> skos:notation. To my mind, this would be a natural construct to use
> to model the position of concepts in the avm hierarchy. Does anyone
> object to this?
Maybe you can comment on why this seems natural, the benefits, any
significant downsides, etc? It's hard to imagine I would have any
objections - but it's also hard to imagine I'll be able to keep up
with evolving drafts of SKOS.
More information about the semantics