ADQL-0.8.1 has been released

[Wil O'Mullane]

OpenSkyQuery is still operating 0.7.4. I think we are fine with 0.7.4
for January and 0.8 going on wards. There are still issues with STC to be resolved with 0.8 in any case.

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:06:43PM +0100, Tony Linde wrote:
> > to use this specification toward the January 2005 demo ! Of  
> 
> I doubt it will be possible to use the full 0.8.1 spec for the Jan demo.
> AstroGrid will *add* support for this version to its data centre service but
> it will not be complete (won't provide INTO or units support; may not
> provide TOP support) before January and certainly won't be robustly tested.
> It will be possible to query datasets via the AstroGrid data centre
> components using 0.8.1 but support for 0.7.4 will be more reliable (same
> component can support multiple versions of ADQL).
> 
> I'll probably recommend that the AVO/AstroGrid demo planned for Jan will be
> based upon 0.7.4. Does anyone see any problem with this?
> 
> What are other projects planning? Will anyone offer a full 0.8.1 data access
> service accessible from externally?
> 
> Cheers,
> Tony. 
> (apologies if this arrives twice - laptop crashed when I pressed Send)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-voql at eso.org [mailto:owner-voql at eso.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Masatoshi OHISHI
> > Sent: 20 August 2004 08:45
> > To: voql at ivoa.net
> > Subject: ADQL-0.8.1 has been released
> > 
> > Hi VOQL members,
> > 
> > ADQL-0.8.1 has been released at
> > 
> > http://www.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/IvoaVOQL .
> > 
> > We made very minor modification to version 0.8; we renamed 
> > "User Defined Functions" to "Built-in Functions", and 
> > clarified several ambiguious portions in that subsection.
> > 
> > Since nobody commented on version 0.8, I believe none of you 
> > have objections to this minor change. However, any comments 
> > are welcome !
> > 
> > In case when I see no strong objections, I would like to you 
> > to use this specification toward the January 2005 demo ! Of 
> > course we can develop our spec further, but such 
> > modifications should not be referred to for the January demo.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> >     Masatoshi
> > 
> >