1.0rc1 WSDL issues - asynchronous calls
dave at ast.cam.ac.uk
Fri Jun 16 07:11:26 PDT 2006
Paul Harrison wrote:
> I am sorry to keep banging on about this, but we cannot brush
> asynchronicity under the carpet as a "2.0" issue when we still
> actually have it present in the 1.0 interface... I think that we need
> to be clear in the specification exactly how we expect this calls to
Yep - I agree.
The fact that questions about this are appearing in emails means that
the document isn't clear enough.
I'll write a new bit of description for each - being explicit about the
I'll post the new descriptions to the document change wiki page.
More information about the vospace