Mandatory transports for VOSpace - why not?
dtody at nrao.edu
Mon Jun 19 06:26:16 PDT 2006
I should think that support for at least HTTP would be mandatory.
Clearly though, one would want to limit the number of mandatory
protocols to a very small number (using widely standardized
technologies likely to available in all implementation environments),
with everything else being optional. - Doug
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Paul Harrison wrote:
> I think I have made it pretty clear why I think that the VOSpace
> specification should include some mandatory protocols - i.e. so that VOSpace
> implementations that are compliant have a common set of protocols that they
> can interoperate with - I genuinely do not understand the arguments for *not*
> mandating some protocols - can someone put forward these arguments?
> Paul Harrison
More information about the vospace