Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5
Martin @ ROE
mch at roe.ac.uk
Tue May 11 08:51:20 PDT 2004
Brian Thomas wrote:
> Well, my concept of BasicQ (and I don't think I'm alone on this)
> is that it was for _holding a single value_, not to make something
> "really simple".
In that case can we change the name to SingleQuantity? There's not
enough distinction between 'Core' and 'Basic'!
Software Engineer, AstroGrid (ROE)
07901 55 24 66
More information about the dm