next generation of Sky in Google Earth
borne at mail630.gsfc.nasa.gov
Wed Jan 23 08:41:08 PST 2008
Roy: I work very closely with several people within OGC.
Roy Williams wrote, On 01/22/2008 10:43 AM:
>> Google has given us a new IVOA standard, it's KML, and we'd better
>> get used to the idea. Possibly the IVOA should accept the status quo
>> and officially adopt it. It might give us a (very) little bit more
> This I find a strange set of statements. Google has not "given us"
> anything. Rather I would say they have made a somewhat ropy standard
> without external consultation, a standard that does not carry rich
> metadata and has very poor image support. Obviously we astronomers are
> forced into using this hand-me-down from the geo people, because
> Google has billions of dollars and billions of customers.
> As for official adoption, my understanding is that Google has handed
> over the KML process to the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), who will
> be creating future versions -- this time with input from the rest of
> the world. I am not sure that IVOA should be making Recommendations on
> KML: what happens if these are different from the OGC version?
> Surely what we need is not just a blanket Recommendation of KML as it
> exists now, but rather VO representation at the OGC meetings? Does
> anyone know anyone at OGC?
More information about the interop