From ndelmott at eso.org Fri Aug 11 00:26:47 2006 From: ndelmott at eso.org (Nausicaa Delmotte) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:26:47 +0200 Subject: UCD-Tech-Board-1 Message-ID: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> Hello ucd-tech, I am not sure to be registered on that list. I guess I should ask the chair person to be added. Is it Andreas? > B. The Board > 1. What > I propose to start from the list of tools/services already drafted at http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/UCD/tools.htx , > revise that list and propose other tools. I'd like to propose a UCD validation tool that would not only detect deprecated words, non-existing words or syntax errors but also check that the Primary/Secondary properties of the words are respected. I don't think it exists yet. For example, with the current .validate web service method at CDS, one cannot detect that instr.obsty.seeing;stat.error is not valid and that stat.error;instr.obsty.seeing should be used instead. Cheers Nausicaa From andrea.preitemartinez at iasf-roma.inaf.it Fri Aug 11 01:51:31 2006 From: andrea.preitemartinez at iasf-roma.inaf.it (Andrea Preite Martinez) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:51:31 +0200 Subject: UCD-Tech-Board-1 In-Reply-To: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> References: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> Message-ID: <20060811105131.lyo2kbz33wc00wcg@webmail.sic.rm.cnr.it> > I'd like to propose a UCD validation tool that would not only detect > deprecated words, non-existing words or syntax errors but also check > that the Primary/Secondary properties of the words are respected. > I don't think it exists yet. > > For example, with the current .validate web service method at CDS, > one cannot detect that instr.obsty.seeing;stat.error is not valid > and that stat.error;instr.obsty.seeing should be used instead. > You are right, the validate tool should test the syntax flag too!! Sebastien, can you (the author of the tool) change this? Thanks. Andrea =================================================================================== Andrea Preite Martinez andrea.preitemartinez at iasf-roma.inaf.it IASF Tel.IASF:+39.06.4993.4651 Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100 Tel.CDS :+33.3.90242452 I-00133 Roma Cell.1 :+39.320.43.15.383 Cell.2 :+39. =================================================================================== From seaman at noao.edu Fri Aug 11 05:41:02 2006 From: seaman at noao.edu (Rob Seaman) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 05:41:02 -0700 Subject: UCD-Tech-Board-1 In-Reply-To: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> References: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> Message-ID: Nausicaa Delmotte wrote: > I'd like to propose a UCD validation tool that would not only detect > deprecated words, non-existing words or syntax errors but also check > that the Primary/Secondary properties of the words are respected. > I don't think it exists yet. > > For example, with the current .validate web service method at CDS, > one cannot detect that instr.obsty.seeing;stat.error is not valid > and that stat.error;instr.obsty.seeing should be used instead. An excellent improvement! I would also like to see such a tool made general enough to validate against diverse UCD namespaces (should others ever exist). Rob From ndelmott at eso.org Fri Aug 11 00:26:47 2006 From: ndelmott at eso.org (Nausicaa Delmotte) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:26:47 +0200 Subject: UCD-Tech-Board-1 Message-ID: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> Hello ucd-tech, I am not sure to be registered on that list. I guess I should ask the chair person to be added. Is it Andreas? > B. The Board > 1. What > I propose to start from the list of tools/services already drafted at http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/UCD/tools.htx , > revise that list and propose other tools. I'd like to propose a UCD validation tool that would not only detect deprecated words, non-existing words or syntax errors but also check that the Primary/Secondary properties of the words are respected. I don't think it exists yet. For example, with the current .validate web service method at CDS, one cannot detect that instr.obsty.seeing;stat.error is not valid and that stat.error;instr.obsty.seeing should be used instead. Cheers Nausicaa From andrea.preitemartinez at iasf-roma.inaf.it Fri Aug 11 01:51:31 2006 From: andrea.preitemartinez at iasf-roma.inaf.it (Andrea Preite Martinez) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:51:31 +0200 Subject: UCD-Tech-Board-1 In-Reply-To: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> References: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> Message-ID: <20060811105131.lyo2kbz33wc00wcg@webmail.sic.rm.cnr.it> > I'd like to propose a UCD validation tool that would not only detect > deprecated words, non-existing words or syntax errors but also check > that the Primary/Secondary properties of the words are respected. > I don't think it exists yet. > > For example, with the current .validate web service method at CDS, > one cannot detect that instr.obsty.seeing;stat.error is not valid > and that stat.error;instr.obsty.seeing should be used instead. > You are right, the validate tool should test the syntax flag too!! Sebastien, can you (the author of the tool) change this? Thanks. Andrea =================================================================================== Andrea Preite Martinez andrea.preitemartinez at iasf-roma.inaf.it IASF Tel.IASF:+39.06.4993.4651 Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100 Tel.CDS :+33.3.90242452 I-00133 Roma Cell.1 :+39.320.43.15.383 Cell.2 :+39. =================================================================================== From seaman at noao.edu Fri Aug 11 05:41:02 2006 From: seaman at noao.edu (Rob Seaman) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 05:41:02 -0700 Subject: UCD-Tech-Board-1 In-Reply-To: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> References: <44DC3137.4040002@eso.org> Message-ID: Nausicaa Delmotte wrote: > I'd like to propose a UCD validation tool that would not only detect > deprecated words, non-existing words or syntax errors but also check > that the Primary/Secondary properties of the words are respected. > I don't think it exists yet. > > For example, with the current .validate web service method at CDS, > one cannot detect that instr.obsty.seeing;stat.error is not valid > and that stat.error;instr.obsty.seeing should be used instead. An excellent improvement! I would also like to see such a tool made general enough to validate against diverse UCD namespaces (should others ever exist). Rob