A suggested revision for UCDs

[Arnold Rots]

It's a simple choice: those who shelled out the money for a Word
license can either try to force the rest of the community to do the
same by sending around Word documents, or spend themselves a little
more by buying an Acrobat license and thus allow everybody to spend
his/her money as (s)he sees fit.
Personally, I think Word should always be bundled with Acrobat, at
least in our community.

  - Arnold

Clive Page wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Thomas McGlynn wrote:
> 
> > A few minutes ago I uploaded a version of my suggested revised
> > proposal for UCDs to the Twiki.  This is just a Word version since
> > I don't have a PDF generator handy.
> 
> An off-topic note to Tom (and others with the same problem in producing
> PDFs):
> 
> Many of us on Unix/Linux systems find Word documents inconvenient; I
> ...
> 
> -- 
> Clive Page
> Dept of Physics & Astronomy,
> University of Leicester,    Tel +44 116 252 3551
> Leicester, LE1 7RH,  U.K.   Fax +44 116 252 3311
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots                                Chandra X-ray Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory                tel:  +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67                              fax:  +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138                             arots at head-cfa.harvard.edu
USA                                     http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------