1.0rc1 WSDL issues [DIME vs. MTOM]
gtr at ast.cam.ac.uk
Fri Jun 16 03:41:32 PDT 2006
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Matthew Graham wrote:
> Guy Rixon wrote:
> >On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Matthew Graham wrote:
> >I agree with dumping DIME in favour of MTOM.
> Dave does have a point, however, about MTOM support. I think that we
> should leave DIME in now but note that it will be deprecated in the next
> release and also introduce MTOM as the successor.
Let's be a little careful about what we mean by "next release". We have
established that VOSpace-1.x and VOSpace-2.x will coexist indefinitely. If we
include DIME specifics in VOSpace 1.0 and deprecate DIME in VOSpace 2.0, then
presumably we also have to deprcate DIME in VOSpace 1.1.
To be clear, I think of VOSpace-1 and VOSpace-2 as two products, "VOSpace
level 1 and "VOSpace level 2" rather than just two versions of one product.
I vote that we leave out DIME altogether from VOSpace 1.0. We can put it, or
MTOM, into VOSpace 1.1 or later when we need it.
Guy Rixon gtr at ast.cam.ac.uk
Institute of Astronomy Tel: +44-1223-337542
Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK, CB3 0HA Fax: +44-1223-337523
More information about the vospace